LET'S ROLL!

CONTACT INFORMATION
National Switchboard 202-225-3121 - 24h/day all week!
Call, Write, FAX MOCs in WA state
All Senators  | Senators' Emails | All Representatives
 Senate Committees
Daily Calendar, Commitee Hearings, Bills, Voting, Etc. 


MORE RESOURCES:
 NEW! How does Budget Reconciliation work?
NEW! Send 5 FAXes/day FREE to your MOCs
NEW! Fact or Rumor? Politifact  |  FactCheck  |  Snopes
9 Steps to Repeal/Replace Obamacare (first 2 already checked off)
Calendar of Resistance Events in WA State
 

"Destroy the Business Model of Breitbart and Fake News"
"The Trump Resistance Plan: Step 1" | "Step 2" | "Step 3"
"From Protests Past, Lessons in What Works"
"Presterity": Reference Digest of Trump Administration Actions
 P.S. Pick a simple action at Wall of Us,  TheSixtyFive, Common Dreams, or Grab Your Wallet

THIS WEEK'S VOTING SCHEDULE ON CABINET NOMINEES

From the Washington Post - this will help me schedule my calls. Call scripts for the Egregious Eight below (Tillerson, Sessions, Pruitt, Price, Puzder, Mnuchin, Mulvaney, DeVos), are on another SIPPA page.

Cantwell and Murray have already indicated their opposition to Sessions and DeVos. Thank the Senators and call the members of the nominees' hearing committees (see DeVos and Sessions below). 

THIS WEEK’S SCHEDULE:

  • Monday:
    • Senate Committee on Small Business & Entrepreneurship votes on Linda McMahon’s nomination to lead the Small Business Administration, time TBA
    • Full Senate votes on invoking cloture for Rex Tillerson’s nomination for secretary of State at around 5:30 p.m.
    • Senate Committee on Finance votes on Steven Mnuchin’s nomination for Treasury secretary around 6 p.m.
  • Tuesday:
    • Senate Judiciary Committee votes on Sen. Jeff Sessions’s (R-Ala.) nomination for attorney general around 9:30 a.m.
    • Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources votes on Rick Perry’s nomination for secretary of Energy around 9:30 a.m.
    • Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources votes on Rep. Ryan Zinke’s (R-Mont.) nomination for secretary of Interior around 9:30 a.m.
    • Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions votes on Betsy DeVos’s nomination for secretary of Education around 10 a.m.
    • Senate Committee on Finance votes on Rep. Tom Price’s nomination for Health and Human Services secretary around 10 a.m.
    • Full Senate votes on Elaine Chao’s nomination for Transportation secretary around 12:20 p.m.
  • Wednesday:
    • Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs holds a hearing for VA secretary nominee David Shulkin
    • Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs votes on Rep. Mick Mulvaney’s nomination for OMB director around 9:40 a.m.
    • Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works votes on Scott Pruitt’s nomination for EPA administrator around 10:45 a.m.
ALREADY CONFIRMED:
  • Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, secretary of Defense
  • Retired Marine Gen. John Kelly, secretary of Homeland Security
  • Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.), CIA director
  • South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R), UN ambassador
NOMINEES IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER:

WHO: Ben Carson
NOMINATED FOR: Housing and Urban Development secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
LATEST VOTE: Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee
ARGUMENT FOR: Carson started his career as a highly accomplished surgeon before turning his attention to politics. His many fans on the conservative right cite his religious faith and rags-to-riches personal story as factors behind their support. Trump has called Carson “brilliant” and a “tough competitor.”
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Carson has no experience in public policy and no particular expertise in housing issues. He is known for promoting theories that prison makes inmates gay and that the pyramids were originally constructed to store grain.
WHO: Elaine Chao
NOMINATED FOR: Transportation secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: 12:20 p.m. Jan. 31, full Senate
ARGUMENT FOR: Chao previously served as deputy secretary at the Transportation Department and secretary of the Labor Department, giving her expansive insight into the workings of federal bureaucracy. Trump praised her “expertise,” “strong leadership” and personal background as an immigrant.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: The nomination of Chao, a consummate Washington insider married to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), defies Trump’s promise to surround himself only with people from outside government.
***WHO: Betsy DeVos - thank Murray and Cantwell and call hearing committee members: http://www.help.senate.gov/about/members
NOMINATED FOR: Education secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: 10 a.m. Jan. 31, Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions
ARGUMENT FOR: To supporters of school voucher programs, DeVos is a champion. A billionaire conservative activist, she has spent millions on programs to expand them across the country. Trump called her a “brilliant and passionate education advocate.”
ARGUMENT AGAINST: DeVos has no professional experience in schools and no traditional experience in education policy. Detractors say her views pose an unprecedented threat to the public school system as a civic institution. FURTHER OBJECTIONS + CALL SCRIPT HERE.
WHO: South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R)
NOMINATED FOR: Ambassador to the United Nations
CONFIRMED? Yes.
FINAL VOTE: 96-4 on Jan. 24
ARGUMENT FOR: A daughter of Indian immigrants and a rising Republican star, Haley is a polished communicator with national security views that fit into the Republican mainstream.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Haley has virtually no experience in foreign policy or international affairs except for leading trade missions on behalf of South Carolina.
WHO: Retired Marine Gen. John Kelly
NOMINATED FOR: Homeland security secretary
CONFIRMED? Yes.
FINAL VOTE: 88-11 on Jan. 20
ARGUMENT FOR: A widely respected and long-serving military officer, Kelly oversaw operations in Central and South America as head of the U.S. Southern Command. Trump praised him as the “right person to spearhead the urgent mission of stopping illegal immigration” and experienced in stopping drug and human trafficking.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: The choice of Kelly further raised questions about Trump’s desire to surround himself with military generals, and Kelly has a blunt manner that can bring him into conflict with other leaders. Detractors have raised concerns about his past comments questioning the Pentagon order opening jobs in combat units to women.
WHO: Robert E. Lighthizer
NOMINATED FOR: U.S. trade representative
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
SENATE HEARING: TBD
ARGUMENT FOR: A former Reagan administration official, Lighthizer has decades of experience in trade policy and litigation. He is currently a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, where he represents heavy manufacturing, agricultural and high-tech companies and has served as lead counsel in “scores of antidumping countervailing duty cases,” according to his official biography.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Lighthizer is a harsh critic of China and has advocated for imposing unilateral tariffs on Chinese imports, a step many believe would risk a trade war.
WHO: Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis
NOMINATED FOR: Defense secretary
CONFIRMED? Yes.
FINAL VOTE: 98-1 on Jan. 20
ARGUMENT FOR: Mattis is highly experienced, having served more than four decades in the Marine Corps, including as the chief of U.S. Central Command. He is highly respected within the military establishment.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Mattis is known for making impolitic comments from time to time, such as “It’s fun to shoot some people,” a remark he made during a panel discussion in 2005. To lead the Pentagon, he needs a waiver from Congress bypassing a federal law that disqualifies military personnel who served on active duty in the previous seven years from becoming defense secretary. He is one of several former generals expected to join the top ranks of Trump’s administration, a source of criticism for the president-elect.
WHO: Linda McMahon
NOMINATED FOR: Administrator of the Small Business Administration
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: Jan. 30, Senate Committee on Small Business & Entrepreneurship (Russell Senate Office Building, Room S-216)
ARGUMENT FOR: Trump praised McMahon, the co-founder and former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment, as “one of the country’s top female executives advising businesses around the globe.”
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Critics have alleged the WWE engaged in questionable labor practices under McMahon’s leadership, including promoting steroid and painkiller abuse and requiring wrestlers to follow a grueling schedule that some say contributed to their premature deaths. Democrats who oppose her nomination say she lacks the policy knowledge to lead the SBA.
***WHO: Steven Mnuchin - Hearing committee members https://www.finance.senate.gov/about/membership
NOMINATED FOR: Treasury secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: 6 p.m. Jan. 30, Senate Committee on Finance (Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room 215)
ARGUMENT FOR: Mnuchin, a highly successful investor and former Goldman Sachs executive, “has played a key role in developing our plan to build a dynamic, booming economy that will create millions of jobs,” Trump said in November.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Mnuchin has no government experience and has articulated few policy views. His tenure on Wall Street seems to contradict Trump’s populist rhetoric on the campaign trail and has become a target for critics. FURTHER OBJECTIONS + CALL SCRIPT HERE.
WHO: Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.) Hearing committee members https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/contact/committee (one convenient email form to whole committee).
NOMINATED FOR: Director of the Office of Management and Budget
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: 9:40 a.m. Feb. 1, Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs
ARGUMENT FOR: Elected to the House in the 2010 tea party wave, Mulvaney is known as a budget policy wonk and vociferous deficit hawk, endearing him to fiscal conservatives. He has served on the House Budget, Financial Services and Oversight and Government Reform Committees.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Mulvaney campaigned for the House on a promise never to raise the debt ceiling and has voted several times against doing so, a position critics believe downplays the potentially disastrous results of a government default. Mulvaney also failed to pay more than $15,000 in state and federal payroll taxes for a household employee, according to a disclosure form obtained by The Post. FURTHER OBJECTIONS + CALL SCRIPT HERE.
WHO: Former Georgia governor Sonny Perdue (R)
NOMINATED FOR: Agriculture secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
SENATE HEARING: TBA
ARGUMENT FOR: Perdue has a strong background in agriculture, having grown up on a farm, owned a grain and fertilizer business and trained as a veterinarian. As the former governor of Georgia, a state where farming is the largest industry, he is familiar with agricultural policy and has experience running a government bureaucracy.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Opponents believe Perdue’s decisions and ties to industry will serve the interests of agribusiness and factory farming at the expense of environmental protection and animal welfare. Perdue has also made statements suggesting he is skeptical of climate change.
WHO: Former Texas governor Rick Perry (R)
NOMINATED FOR: Energy secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: 9:30 a.m. Jan. 31, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
ARGUMENT FOR: Perry was the longest-serving governor in the history of Texas, a major oil-and-gas state.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Perry has voiced support for abolishing the Energy Department, and environmental groups worry his confirmation would mean rolling back efforts to expand renewable energy. He has also repeatedly questioned scientific findings about climate change.
WHO: Rep Mike Pompeo.  (R-Kan.)
NOMINATED FOR: CIA director
CONFIRMED? Yes.
FINAL VOTE: 66-32 on Jan. 23
ARGUMENT FOR: Pompeo, who was elected to the House in 2010, serves on the House Intelligence Committee. A graduate of the U.S. Military Academy, he served as an cavalry officer before founding an aerospace company — a varied record that Trump favors. He was praised as “bright and hard-working” by Democratic House colleague Adam B. Schiff (Calif.).
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Pompeo has no meaningful experience in espionage. He is seen as a fierce partisan on issues such as the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, and the leaks by Edward Snowden, a tendency some CIA veterans fear could bias his judgment.
***WHO: Rep Tom Price (R-Ga.) http://www.help.senate.gov/about/members
NOMINATED FOR: Health and Human Services secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: 10 a.m. Jan. 31, Senate Committee on Finance https://www.finance.senate.gov/about/membership
ARGUMENT FOR: Price, a third-generation doctor and chairman of the House Budget Committee, is a health-care policy expert who has proposed his own alternative to Obamacare.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Critics point to Price’s desire to repeal the Affordable Care Act and overhaul U.S. entitlement programs as a reason not to confirm him. Price’s stock portfolio is also receiving scrutiny amid revelations he bought and sold shares in health-care companies that would be affected by legislation he worked on. FURTHER OBJECTIONS + CALL SCRIPT HERE..
***WHO: Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt
NOMINATED FOR: EPA administrator
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: 10:45 a.m. Feb. 1, Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works - http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/members
ARGUMENT FOR: Pruitt is an “expert in constitutional law” and “one of the country’s top attorneys general” who has a deep familiarity with federal environmental and energy regulations.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Pruitt has spent his tenure as attorney general fighting the Environmental Protection Agency. Critics point to his philosophical differences with the agency’s mission as reason not to confirm him.
***WHO: Andrew Puzder
NOMINATED FOR: Labor secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
SENATE HEARING: Feb. 7; Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions - http://www.help.senate.gov/about/members
ARGUMENT FOR: Puzder is chief executive of CKE Restaurants, the parent company of Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. Trump said he has “created and boosted the careers of thousands of Americans.”
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Detractors point to Puzder’s opposition to the Affordable Care Act, federal rules that would make more workers eligible for overtime pay and substantially raising the minimum wage to argue he should not lead the Labor Department. His ex-wife accused him of beating her — Puzder denies any physical abuse — in their 1986 divorce proceedings. He has also faced criticism for his company’s use of racy and suggestive advertising. FURTHER OBJECTIONS + CALL SCRIPT HERE..
WHO: Wilbur Ross
NOMINATED FOR: Commerce secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: TBA, full Senate
ARGUMENT FOR: Trump praised Ross, a billionaire investor who made his fortune restructuring distressed companies, as a “champion of American manufacturing” and “one of the greatest negotiators I have ever met.” Supporters hope his experience as a turnaround specialist will boost jobs and reinvigorate troubled U.S. industries.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Ross’s record of buying and restructuring troubled businesses sometimes involved layoffs and budget cuts. He is a hard-line supporter of renegotiating or withdrawing from free-trade agreements, a stance that puts him in conflict with free-market Republican orthodoxy.
***WHO: Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) Thank Murray and Cantwell and call hearing committee members: https://aclj.org/supreme-court-justices/senate-judiciary-committee-members-contact-information-2004
NOMINATED FOR: Attorney general
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: 9:30 a.m. Jan. 31, Senate Judiciary Committee (Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room 226)
ARGUMENT FOR: Trump has praised Sessions, a longtime adviser and supporter, as a “world-class legal mind.” First elected in 1996, Sessions previously served as a U.S. attorney and attorney general for Alabama. He has earned praise from Democrats who work with him.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Accusations of racism have dogged Sessions’s career. He was denied a federal judgeship in 1986 after former colleagues testified he used the n-word and said the Ku Klux Klan was “okay” until he realized Klan members smoked marijuana. FURTHER OBJECTIONS + CALL SCRIPT HERE..
WHO: David Shulkin
NOMINATED FOR: Veterans Affairs secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
SENATE HEARING: Feb. 1, Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
ARGUMENT FOR: Shulkin already serves as VA’s Undersecretary for Health, giving him firsthand experience leading one of the department’s largest administrations. He was confirmed unanimously for the job in June 2015, and prior to that, spent 30 years leading private hospitals.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Trump supporters say it is not clear Shulkin agrees with the president’s desire to dramatically expand private care for veterans, and some point to ongoing problems with the Veterans Health Administration to argue he was the wrong choice. If confirmed, Shulkin would be the first VA secretary not to have served in the military.
***WHO: Rex Tillerson
NOMINATED FOR: Secretary of state
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: 5:30 p.m. Jan. 30 on invoking cloture, full Senate. Contact Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and minority leader Chuck Schumer
ARGUMENT FOR: Trump sees Tillerson, who joined ExxonMobil in 1975 and served as its chief executive, as the “embodiment of the American Dream.” Trump has praised his “tenacity, broad experience and deep understanding of geopolitics.” As a global business leader, Tillerson has experience dealing with heads of state around the world, including in Russia, Saudi Arabia and Yemen.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Tillerson has no experience in the public sector, received the Order of Friendship from Russian President Vladimir Putin and brings along potential conflicts of interest from his business career. It’s also unclear whether he supports sanctions implemented against Russia in 2014 over its annexation of Crimea and Moscow’s support for separatists in Ukraine. FURTHER OBJECTIONS + CALL SCRIPT HERE..
WHO: Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-Mont.)
NOMINATED FOR: Interior secretary
CONFIRMED? Not yet.
NEXT VOTE: 9:30 a.m. Jan. 31, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
ARGUMENT FOR: Zinke, an outdoor enthusiast and fifth-generation Montanan, sits on the House Natural Resources Committee. Trump praised his “impressive portfolio on Interior issues ranging from federal mineral leases to tribal affairs to public lands conservation” and noted his experience and “incredible leadership skills” as a Navy SEAL from 1986 to 2008.
ARGUMENT AGAINST: Zinke, who has spent only one term in Congress, has been widely criticized by environmental groups for opposing their agenda on issues ranging from protections for endangered species to coal extraction to gas drilling. He said during a 2014 debate that climate change is “not a hoax, but it’s not proven science either.”

WHO'S STANDING UP FOR REFUGEES? NOT THE GOP!

What's your Senator's stance on Trump's ban? This spreadsheet will tell you.

Below is a call script from the International Rescue Committee:

Call 202-224-3441. "I’m your constituent from [City, State], and I urge you to oppose President Trump’s decision to slash refugee admissions, grind resettlement to a halt, stop resettling refugees from Syria, and preference religious minorities. This announcement flies in the face of core American values and this country’s founding principles. It does not reflect the welcome for refugees I see in my community every day. Giving refugee families the chance to live freely and without fear makes this country stronger, safer, and more prosperous. Please urge President Trump to abandon this plan."


OPPOSING MIKE MULVANEY FOR OMB HEAD



An Extremist Holding the Purse Strings
President Trump will hardly be short of far-right cabinet members, including an education secretary who has called public schools a “dead end,” a labor secretary who has been cited for employment law violations and an Environmental Protection Agency administrator who has sued his own department.
But within the Trump team, the views of Representative Mick Mulvaney, Republican of South Carolina, his little-known choice to lead the important Office of Management and Budget, rank as among the most reactionary.
...Mr. Mulvaney — a founding member of the Freedom Caucus with an almost perfect conservative voting record — spent his six-year congressional career leading the charge against federal spending and borrowing, voting against everything from Hurricane Sandy relief to reopening the government after the 2013 shutdown.
His intransigence placed him well to the right of Republican leadership, including former Speaker John Boehner, whom he repeatedly opposed for — get this — being excessively soft on curbing disbursements from the federal purse.
Not surprisingly, cutting deeply into core retirement and health care programs is at the top of his to-do list. “We have to end Medicare as we know it,” he said on Fox Business Network, soon after entering Congress in 2011. (Medicare enjoys support from 77 percent of Americans, according to a 2015 Kaiser Foundation poll.)
While Mr. Mulvaney is not alone in his terrifying views, the difference between him and other members of his deeply conservative brigade is that he will likely soon have an unusual opportunity to cement them into place; O.M.B. (as it is universally known) is the control center for the administration’s fiscal policy.
Each year, the budget office oversees the federal government’s budgeting process, receiving requests from individual agencies, analyzing them and making recommendations to the president as to what spending should be requested from Congress and what the deficit should be.
From that perch, Mr. Mulvaney will be well positioned to help excise funding for the Affordable Care Act, defund Planned Parenthood, abolish the Export-Import Bank, eliminate government-financed research, raise the retirement age for Social Security to 70 and even clamp down on off-budget military spending, to name just a few of his targets.
We may already be starting to see the shadowy outlines of this kind of agenda; the new administration is reportedly considering proposals to cut $10.5 trillion of spending over the next decade, more than 40 percent of many important programs.
Mr. Mulvaney shares many extreme economic views with his first choice for the Republican nomination, the libertarian-leaning senator Rand Paul, particularly his belief that the mounting national debt is an existential crisis that must be addressed regardless of the consequences.
In that quest, the 49-year-old South Carolinian has argued for a balanced-budget amendment, a truly terrible idea that would eliminate the federal government’s ability to use deficit spending in times of economic weakness.
Similarly, he has repeatedly voted against legislation to raise the debt ceiling, without which the federal government would shut down and possibly even default on its obligations, neither of which seemed to bother the congressman.
And like his new boss, Mr. Mulvaney has suggested that if the nation’s debt continued to mount, one way to address that problem would be to push creditors to accept less than full payment.

The consequences of that, said Janet Yellen, the Federal Reserve chairwoman, with classic Fed understatement, would be “very severe,” at a minimum resulting “in much higher borrowing costs for American households and businesses.” 
The feelings are mutual. Mr. Mulvaney has repeatedly blasted the Federal Reserve’s low interest rate policies, including at a dinner held by the John Birch Society, an ultraconservative organization founded in 1958 that today could be branded alt-right.
His antipathy toward the Fed has led him to support legislation that would severely compromise the central bank’s independence. That’s among Mr. Mulvaney’s most misguided notions; the Fed’s strong response to the financial crisis played a key role in the economic recovery of the last eight years.
And then there’s the budget office’s responsibility for reviewing every major proposed regulation — as well as existing ones — ... will allow him to continue his war against government rules of almost every flavor.
I’ll be curious to see how Mr. Mulvaney meshes with his new colleagues. As he acknowledged Tuesday, his unabashed advocacy of cutting Social Security and Medicare puts him at odds with his new boss.
The new president has also said that no one should lose their health care when Obamacare is replaced, while the alternatives that Mr. Mulvaney has supported would inevitably result in many losing their insurance.
In the same vein, he will surely hate Mr. Trump’s plans for enormous unfinanced tax cuts and huge infrastructure spending, which are projected to increase total deficits by $5.3 trillion over the next 10 years.
Policy differences aren’t unusual within the new team. But those who know Mr. Mulvaney say that his absolutism will make it difficult for him to make the compromises that are inevitably necessary in the policy-making process.

CALL SCRIPT - MIKE MULVANEY:
(Ask Senators Cantwell and Murray to speak out and lobby as well as to vote.)


Cantwell (D-WA)
(206) 220-6400
(202) 224-3441

Murray (D-WA)
(425) 259-6515
(202) 224-2621




Caller: Hi there, I’m a constituent of Senator MURRAY/CANTWELL. Can I please speak with the staffer who would be handling her position on Mike Mulvaney as head of the Office of Budget and Management?
Staffer: I’m happy to take down any comments you may have. Can I ask for your name and address to verify you’re in our district?
Caller: Sure. [Gives name/address]. Can I ask who I’m speaking with?
Staffer: Yes, this is [_____________].
 Caller: Thanks, [__________] 

I fully support Senator Murray/Cantwell’s vote against the MATTIS waiver as Secretary of Defense and her expected NO vote against Jeff SESSIONS. 

I’m calling to ask whether the Senator will vote in opposition to the nomination of
Mike Mulvaney as head of the Office of Budget and Management. I am concerned that Mulvaney has repeatedly said he is in favor of reducing or even eliminating essential retirement and health care programs, including Medicaid. He has repeatedly voted against raising the U.S. debt ceiling, which could lead to government default on its debt obligations, and has supported legislation to severely compromise the Central Bank's independence. Clearly an absolutist and a radical determined to axe well-regarded features of the U.S. financial system, Mulvaney does not belong IN the OMB, let alone as its director.

Can you tell me the Senator’s position on this? Will she vote against Mike Mulvaney’s confirmation and lobby Senators on the Right to do the same? 

If yes:  I am so happy that she opposes the confirmation of Mulvaney. I and my group will be sure to let all our friends and family know about her position. We cannot express strongly enough how much support she has in pushing back on these—and any other—of Trump’s appointments that don’t meet a reasonable standard of competence, moderation, and ethics. 
        (P.S for Cantwell: While we thank her for steps she’s taken so far along these lines, in a challenging political atmosphere,we want her to know that we're watching every vote and every time she stands up (or doesn’t stand up). There will be consequences for ignoring the will of Washingtonian to resist the Trump agenda wherever it threatens Progressive and democratic programs and policy.

If no:  I am very disappointed to hear that. We will be sure to tell as many as possible of her constituents that she supports/does not oppose Mike Mulvaney.
           (P.S. for Cantwell: Thus far, Senator Cantwell hasn't really won me over for a fourth term in 2018. For example, I'm deeply concerned that she never took a public position against Steve Bannon, as Sen. Murray did. If Senator Cantwell doesn’t faithfully represent the will of WA state, we'll primary her and get someone who will.)

If you have time, contact Ron Johnson (R-WI), chair of the Homeland Security & Gov'tal Affairs Committee responsible for the Mulvaney hearing.